Treating cataracts in babies: Contacts or IOLs?
Category: Cataract Surgery, Intraocular Lenses (IOLs), ResearchThankfully, congenital cataracts are relatively rare. But when a baby is born with cataracts, prompt treatment is essential to insure normal infant vision development and prevent permanent vision loss from amblyopia.
Performing cataract surgery on an infant poses special challenges to cataract surgeons. Also, an often-debated question is whether the best treatment for the young, developing eyes of an infant after cataract removal is implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) or the use of contact lenses.
To answer this question, Scott R. Lambert, MD, at Emory University (Atlanta, Ga.) and other members of the multi-center Infant Aphakia Treatment Study Group conducted a study of the two treatment options.
The researchers compared the visual outcomes and adverse events among 114 infants with congenital cataracts who underwent cataract surgery at an average age of 1.8 months. The infants were randomly assigned to either be treated with an IOL (57 infants) or with contact lenses (57 infants).
Results of the study revealed that surgical complications occurred in 28 percent of infants in the IOL group and 11 percent of those in the contact lens group.
At 1 year of age, visual acuity results were equal in the two groups, but more infants in the IOL group (77 percent) experienced adverse events after surgery, compared with 25 percent in the contact lens group.
Infants in the IOL group also were five times more likely to undergo additional eye surgery (63 percent compared with 12 percent in the contact lens group).
“There appears to be no short-term visual benefit and some increased risk to implanting intraocular lenses in infants,” the researchers concluded. But they also said it is “premature to recommend that intraocular lenses not be implanted in infants” and that a longer a follow-up period is needed to clarify the role of IOLs in the treatment of congenital cataracts.
A full report of the study will appear in the July 2010 print issue of Archives of Ophthalmology.